| Agency | What they do | People | Location | Website |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnona Partners | Its website shows a portfolio and its team. We did not find case studies, prices or an address there. | 2 - 9 | Atlanta | www.winnonapartners.com |
| 7Factor Software | Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | www.7factor.io |
| IfThen Digital | Its website shows a portfolio, case studies and an address. We did not find prices or a named team there. | 50 - 249 | Atlanta | www.ifthen.com/ |
| Army of Bees | We did not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, a named team or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | www.armyofbees.com/ |
| SolutionBuilt | Its website shows a portfolio, its team and an address. We did not find case studies or prices there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | www.solutionbuilt.com/ |
| Gad.Ai | We did not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, a named team or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | gad.ai |
| Flatirons Development | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | flatirons.com | |
| Big Nerd Ranch | 250 - 999 | Atlanta | www.bignerdranch.com | |
| Azul Arc | Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | azularc.com |
| Tyrannosaurus Tech | Its website shows case studies, prices and its team. We did not find a portfolio or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | tyrannosaurustech.com |
| AppZoro Technologies, Inc. | Its website shows a portfolio, case studies, prices, its team and an address. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | appzoro.com |
| Ragsdale Design Group (RDG) | Its website shows a portfolio, its team and an address. We did not find case studies or prices there. | 2 - 9 | Atlanta | rdgatl.com |
| Codesmith Development | Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there. | 10 - 49 | Atlanta | codesmithdev.com |
| Starborn Media, LLC | 2 - 9 | Atlanta | starbornmedia.com | |
| Triguna Softwares | 50 - 249 | Atlanta | www.trigunasoftwares.com |
Best 15+ Web Development Companies in Atlanta
Discover and compare agencies within minutes.
- 40,000+brands
- trust us since 2019
- 500+agencies
- carefully vetted
- 5,000+projects
- successfully completed
Explore List Of Atlanta's Top Rated Web Development
15+ agencies in this category
This page lists 15 web development companies on Edvido. Edvido is not an agency but a smart platform, free for brands: send your brief, get matched right away, completely free.
Search services
Search location
Edvido Agency Index: Web development companies in Atlanta
An open-methodology index of web development companies in Atlanta. We score publicly verifiable signals from each agency's own website and public sources on a 100-point scale. We do not rate the quality of work, and positions are not for sale — Edvido membership does not affect the index score. How the scores work · Data (JSON)
| # | Agency | Score | Info | Prices | Proof | Reputation | Contact | Visibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AppZoro Technologies, Inc. | 59 | 20/20 | 7/15 | 20/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 5/15 |
| 2 | SolutionBuilt | 44.5 | 18.5/20 | 0/15 | 14/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 5/15 |
| 3 | Tyrannosaurus Tech | 44 | 13/20 | 7/15 | 12/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 5/15 |
| 4 | Azul Arc | 41 | 14/20 | 0/15 | 12/20 | 0/20 | 10/10 | 5/15 |
| 5 | IfThen Digital | 40 | 13/20 | 0/15 | 20/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 0/15 |
| 6 | Winnona Partners | 38 | 17/20 | 0/15 | 14/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 0/15 |
| 7 | Ragsdale Design Group (RDG) | 37 | 17/20 | 0/15 | 8/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 5/15 |
| 8 | 7Factor Software | 36 | 17/20 | 0/15 | 12/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 0/15 |
| 9 | Codesmith Development | 30 | 17/20 | 0/15 | 6/20 | 0/20 | 7/10 | 0/15 |
| 10 | Gad.Ai | 22.5 | 7.5/20 | 0/15 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 10/10 | 5/15 |
| 11 | Army of Bees | 10.5 | 7.5/20 | 0/15 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 3/10 | 0/15 |
Last checked 13 October 2026 · method v0.1-pilot. Unverified data scores 0 points and is listed as "unverified", not as a negative finding. Not ranked (4) — the agency's website could not be checked or is not listed: Big Nerd Ranch, Flatirons Development, Starborn Media, LLC, Triguna Softwares.
#1 · AppZoro Technologies, Inc. — 59/100
AppZoro Technologies, Inc.
AppZoro Technologies, Inc. scored 59/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #1 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes a portfolio, case studies, prices, its team and a physical address.
Information transparency20 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s3] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s7] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Physical address published [s6] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s6] | 3/3 |
Price transparency7 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | At least one price published [s1] | 7/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work20 / 20
| ✓ | Portfolio or work page [s4] | 8/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s5] | 6/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s6] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | appzoro.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | appzoro.com/services/mobile-app-development-company-usa | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | appzoro.com/our-team | Team page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | appzoro.com/how-we-work | Portfolio page | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | appzoro.com/case-study | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s6 | appzoro.com/contact-us | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s7 | appzoro.com/services/ai-development-services | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#2 · SolutionBuilt — 44.5/100
SolutionBuilt
SolutionBuilt scored 44.5/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #2 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes a portfolio, its team and a physical address. We could not find case studies and prices on its website.
Information transparency18.5 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ◐ | Service list published [s1] | 1.5/3 |
| ✓ | Physical address published [s4] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s4] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work14 / 20
| ✓ | Portfolio or work page [s3] | 8/8 |
| ✗ | Case studies with results [s3] | 0/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s4] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | solutionbuilt.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | solutionbuilt.com/about | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | solutionbuilt.com/projects | Portfolio page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | solutionbuilt.com/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#3 · Tyrannosaurus Tech — 44/100
Tyrannosaurus Tech
Tyrannosaurus Tech scored 44/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #3 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes case studies, prices and its team. We could not find a portfolio and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency13 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | About page published [s1] | 0/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s4] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s4] | 3/3 |
Price transparency7 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | At least one price published [s1] | 7/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work12 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s3] | 6/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s4] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | tyrannosaurustech.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | tyrannosaurustech.com/our-team | Team page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | tyrannosaurustech.com/case-studies | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | tyrannosaurustech.com/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | tyrannosaurustech.com/what-we-do | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#4 · Azul Arc — 41/100
Azul Arc
Azul Arc scored 41/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #4 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes case studies and its team. We could not find a portfolio, prices and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency14 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s3] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s1] | 0/3 |
| ✗ | Phone or email published [s1] | 0/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work12 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s4] | 6/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility10 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s1] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 3/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | azularc.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | azularc.com/website-development-company | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | azularc.com/join-our-team | Team page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | azularc.com/case-management-systems | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | azularc.com/court-software-solutions | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#5 · IfThen Digital — 40/100
IfThen Digital
IfThen Digital scored 40/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #5 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes a portfolio, case studies and a physical address. We could not find prices and its team on its website.
Information transparency13 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✗ | Team or founders named [s2] | 0/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s6] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Physical address published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Phone or email published [s5] | 0/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work20 / 20
| ✓ | Portfolio or work page [s3] | 8/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s4] | 6/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s5] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility0 / 15
| ✗ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 0/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | ifthen.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | ifthen.com/about | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | ifthen.com/work | Portfolio page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | ifthen.com/case-study/ccrrc | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | ifthen.com/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s6 | ifthen.com/services | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#6 · Winnona Partners — 38/100
Winnona Partners
Winnona Partners scored 38/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #6 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes a portfolio and its team. We could not find case studies, prices and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency17 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s4] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s4] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work14 / 20
| ✓ | Portfolio or work page [s3] | 8/8 |
| ✗ | Case studies with results [s3] | 0/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s4] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility0 / 15
| ✗ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 0/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | winnonapartners.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | winnonapartners.com/about | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | winnonapartners.com/software-development-projects | Portfolio page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | winnonapartners.com/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | winnonapartners.com/services | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#7 · Ragsdale Design Group (RDG) — 37/100
Ragsdale Design Group (RDG)
Ragsdale Design Group (RDG) scored 37/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #7 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes a portfolio, its team and a physical address. We could not find case studies and prices on its website.
Information transparency17 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s4] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Physical address published [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Phone or email published [s1] | 0/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work8 / 20
| ✓ | Portfolio or work page [s3] | 8/8 |
| ✗ | Case studies with results [s3] | 0/6 |
| ✗ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 0/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s1] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | rdgatl.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | rdgatl.com/who-we-are | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | rdgatl.com/our-work | Portfolio page | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | rdgatl.com/what-we-do | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#8 · 7Factor Software — 36/100
7Factor Software
7Factor Software scored 36/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #8 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes case studies and its team. We could not find a portfolio, prices and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency17 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s4] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s4] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work12 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s3] | 6/6 |
| ✓ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 6/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s4] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility0 / 15
| ✗ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 0/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | 7factor.io | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | 7factor.io/company | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | 7factor.io/case-studies | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | 7factor.io/company/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | 7factor.io/offering/services | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#9 · Codesmith Development — 30/100
Codesmith Development
Codesmith Development scored 30/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #9 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Its website publishes case studies and its team. We could not find a portfolio, prices and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency17 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | About page published [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Team or founders named [s2] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | Service list published [s5] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s4] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s4] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work6 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✓ | Case studies with results [s3] | 6/6 |
| ✗ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 0/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility7 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s4] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility0 / 15
| ✗ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 0/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | codesmithdev.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
| s2 | codesmithdev.com/about-us | About page | 2026-10-13 |
| s3 | codesmithdev.com/case-studies | Case studies | 2026-10-13 |
| s4 | codesmithdev.com/contact | Contact page | 2026-10-13 |
| s5 | codesmithdev.com/services | Services page | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#10 · Gad.Ai — 22.5/100
Gad.Ai
Gad.Ai scored 22.5/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #10 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
We could not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, its team and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency7.5 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | About page published [s1] | 0/4 |
| ✗ | Team or founders named [s1] | 0/4 |
| ◐ | Service list published [s1] | 1.5/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s1] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s1] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work0 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | Case studies with results [s1] | 0/6 |
| ✗ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 0/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility10 / 10
| ✓ | Contact page or form [s1] | 4/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✓ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 3/3 |
Digital & AI visibility5 / 15
| ✓ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 5/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | gad.ai | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
#11 · Army of Bees — 10.5/100
Army of Bees
Army of Bees scored 10.5/100 on the Edvido Agency Index — rank #11 of 11 ranked web development companies in Atlanta. Last checked: 13 October 2026.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
We could not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, its team and a physical address on its website.
Information transparency7.5 / 20
| ✓ | Secure website (HTTPS) [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | About page published [s1] | 0/4 |
| ✗ | Team or founders named [s1] | 0/4 |
| ◐ | Service list published [s1] | 1.5/3 |
| ✗ | Physical address published [s1] | 0/3 |
| ✓ | Phone or email published [s1] | 3/3 |
Price transparency0 / 15
| ✗ | Pricing or packages page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | At least one price published [s1] | 0/7 |
Portfolio & proof of work0 / 20
| ✗ | Portfolio or work page [s1] | 0/8 |
| ✗ | Case studies with results [s1] | 0/6 |
| ✗ | Named clients or testimonials [s1] | 0/6 |
Public reputation0 / 20
| ? | Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/10 |
| ? | Google review volume Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
| ? | Recent reviews (last 12 months) Not yet collected in this pilot | 0/5 |
Communication & accessibility3 / 10
| ✗ | Contact page or form [s1] | 0/4 |
| ✓ | English-language website [s1] | 3/3 |
| ✗ | Instant channel (WhatsApp / chat) [s1] | 0/3 |
Digital & AI visibility0 / 15
| ✗ | Organization structured data on website [s1] | 0/5 |
| ? | Named by AI assistants for local queries Not yet measured in this pilot | 0/10 |
✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (0 points, not a negative finding)
Data we could not verify: Google rating (Bayesian-adjusted), Google review volume, Recent reviews (last 12 months), Named by AI assistants for local queries.
Sources
| s1 | armyofbees.com | Homepage | 2026-10-13 |
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
Big Nerd Ranch — not ranked
Big Nerd Ranch
Listed among web development companies in Atlanta but not ranked: Website did not respond on 2026-10-13.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
Flatirons Development — not ranked
Flatirons Development
Listed among web development companies in Atlanta but not ranked: Website content could not be read automatically on 2026-10-13.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
Starborn Media, LLC — not ranked
Starborn Media, LLC
Listed among web development companies in Atlanta but not ranked: Website did not respond on 2026-10-13.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
Triguna Softwares — not ranked
Triguna Softwares
Listed among web development companies in Atlanta but not ranked: Website did not respond on 2026-10-13.
Measures publicly verifiable transparency and visibility signals, not the quality of work. Not an Edvido member; membership would not change the score.
Is this your agency? Claim the profile to correct data or respond to briefs from brands. Claiming or joining Edvido does not change the index score.
Winnona Partners
Web Development
Its website shows a portfolio and its team. We did not find case studies, prices or an address there.
Edvido Index#6/1138/100details2 - 9members
Located inAtlanta
7Factor Software
Web Development
Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there.
Edvido Index#8/1136/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
IfThen Digital
Web Development
Its website shows a portfolio, case studies and an address. We did not find prices or a named team there.
Edvido Index#5/1140/100details50 - 249members
Located inAtlanta
Get offers from experienced agencies tailored to your goals.
Army of Bees
Web Development
We did not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, a named team or an address there.
Edvido Index#11/1110.5/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
SolutionBuilt
Web Development
Its website shows a portfolio, its team and an address. We did not find case studies or prices there.
Edvido Index#2/1144.5/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Gad.Ai
Web Development
We did not find a portfolio, case studies, prices, a named team or an address there.
Edvido Index#10/1122.5/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Get offers from experienced agencies tailored to your goals.
Flatirons Development
Web Development
10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Big Nerd Ranch
Web Development
250 - 999members
Located inAtlanta
Azul Arc
Web Development
Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there.
Edvido Index#4/1141/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Tyrannosaurus Tech
Web Development
Its website shows case studies, prices and its team. We did not find a portfolio or an address there.
Edvido Index#3/1144/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
AppZoro Technologies, Inc.
Web Development
Its website shows a portfolio, case studies, prices, its team and an address.
Edvido Index#1/1159/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Ragsdale Design Group (RDG)
Web Development
Its website shows a portfolio, its team and an address. We did not find case studies or prices there.
Edvido Index#7/1137/100details2 - 9members
Located inAtlanta
Codesmith Development
Web Development
Its website shows case studies and its team. We did not find a portfolio, prices or an address there.
Edvido Index#9/1130/100details10 - 49members
Located inAtlanta
Starborn Media, LLC
Web Development
2 - 9members
Located inAtlanta
Triguna Softwares
Web Development
50 - 249members
Located inAtlanta
Connect. Convert. Grow.
Start your project today without any cost and meet qualified experts who can get the job done. We help you make the best choice, hassle-free.
- Get quotes at lightning speed
- millions in revenue created
Explore Web Development Companies in Atlanta
Didn't find what you were looking for? Browse other categories
Cities
- Web Development Companies in Boston· 11 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Charlotte· 12 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Kansas City· 11 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Los Angeles· 9 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Miami· 9 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Nashville· 9 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Philadelphia· 10 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Phoenix· 9 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in San Diego· 13 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Sacramento· 8 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in San Francisco· 11 agencies scored
- Web Development Companies in Washington D.C.· 12 agencies scored
Countries
- Web Development Companies in United States· 12 agencies scored
Categories
- Digital Marketing Agencies in Atlanta· 10 agencies scored
- SEO Agencies in Atlanta· 8 agencies scored
Recommended for You
Discover services
Atlanta Web Development Companies List (15)
Latest Web Development Projects
Discover the latest created projects in Web Development
What Our Clients Are Saying About Edvido
Elif Cetinkaya
Region Manager at Danone Nutricia
Agency Selection
Edvido agency provided us a quality service with incredible speed during our selection process. It's the only address you can choose with trust in this field.
Seda Yimenicioglu
Product Manager at Orzax Pharmaceuticals
SEO
I use Edvido frequently. It reduces processes that would take weeks to a few days. I am also incredibly pleased with the seo agency we work with.
Nazli Acar
Vivoo
Creative Agency
We were looking for an agency that could do business on a global scale. We started working with an amazing creative agency through Edvido.
Gülin Özgen
Marketing Director at Kingston
Business Partnerships
Edvido is a very good platform for companies looking for new business partners. The match was perfect. Thank you Edvido.
Murat Sargin
Board Member at Cardiac Surgery
Social Media
We concluded our association's search for a social media agency in Edvido. We have a great cooperation with the team we work with.
Metin Uysal
Etkin Group
Software
We were looking for the right company to develop our digital product. Thanks to Edvido, we quickly found the software company that best suited our needs and vision. The process was both fast and highly efficient; working with the right team gave our project a strong start.
Sedat Coşkun
Epikplus CEO
Business Partnerships
If you want to grow, becoming an Edvido member is a must.
Blog & Insights
Explore our marketing and software focused content
Almost nobody in this market is building a first website. The typical brief is a replatform: a site assembled over years on a content system nobody wants to touch, with a redesign layered on top of it, a few hundred pages that still earn traffic, and a marketing team that cannot afford a bad launch week. That is a different web development purchase from a new build, and the proposals that win it are the ones that take the existing site seriously.
This page is a practical guide to buying web development here. The supplier profiles below give you the shortlist; the sections that follow give you the questions that separate a firm who has replatformed a working site from one who has only built new ones.
Read the web development quote for what is missing, not what is listed
Two proposals at similar totals usually differ in what sits outside the line items. Ask each supplier to state in writing whether the following are included or excluded: content entry and who does it, image preparation, form and tracking setup, third party scripts your marketing stack requires, accessibility fixes found during testing, cross browser and device testing, staging and production environments, the launch itself out of hours if that is what you need, and the defect period afterwards.
Content entry is the item that most often turns a fixed price web development contract into a series of invoices. Somebody has to move text and images into the new structure, decide what gets cut, and rewrite what no longer fits the template. If the quote assumes you will do it, say so out loud and count the hours, because marketing teams routinely underestimate that work and then delay the launch while they catch up.
Content modelling is where an Atlanta web development project is won or lost
The structure behind the pages decides how expensive the site is to run for the next several years. A content model built from reusable fields, with real relationships between locations, services, people and case studies, lets an editor publish without a developer. A model built as a pile of free text areas produces a site that looks finished and needs a ticket for every change.
This matters more than usual for businesses with many locations, franchises or service areas, which describes a large share of the companies buying here. Ask how a new location is added, how long it takes, and whether the page it produces is genuinely different from the others or a template with a name swapped in. Ask to see the editing interface of a site the supplier built, populated with real content, and ask a colleague who is not technical to try adding a page while you watch.
Migration, redirects and the traffic you already have
The fastest way to lose money on a replatform is to lose the rankings you spent years earning. Before design starts, someone needs to produce an inventory of every existing page with its traffic, and a mapping from each old address to a new one. Pages that disappear without a redirect become errors; pages that all redirect to the home page are only slightly better.
Put this in the contract as a named deliverable with an owner. Agree who supplies the analytics and search data, who writes the mapping, who implements it, and who checks it after launch. Ask what the supplier does about page structure, internal links, metadata and structured data during the move, and whether any of that is billed separately. A supplier who has done this will offer the redirect map before you ask; one who has not will describe it as a technical detail. If organic traffic is a major channel for you, it is worth aligning the build with your search specialists before the structure is frozen rather than after.
What happens in the weeks after launch
Most web development disputes after launch are really disagreements about a word. Define a defect as a difference from the agreed specification, not as anything you dislike on the day. Then agree how long the supplier fixes defects at no cost, how quickly they respond to something that breaks checkout or forms, and what the escalation path is at midnight. Distinguish this from change requests, which are new work and should be priced.
Separately, decide who keeps the site alive. Content systems, plugins and libraries need updating, certificates expire, and a site nobody maintains becomes an incident eventually. Either buy a maintenance arrangement with a stated scope and response time, or assign it internally to a named person. The worst outcome is the common one, where everybody assumes the other party is watching.
Turning three proposals into a decision
Brief a small number of firms, not a long list, and give each the same document, the same access to your analytics, and the same deadline. Insist on meeting the developer who would do the work rather than only the account lead. Ask how much of the delivery is subcontracted and to whom. Ask for a reference from a client whose site they replatformed and then supported for at least a year, because support reveals more about a supplier than a launch does.
Where the brand direction and page design are still open, that is a separate engagement and it is reasonable to compare web design agencies for it in parallel. When your requirements are written down, send the brief and collect matched proposals from firms that fit it. You can also work through the full directory of web development companies, and if the site is mainly a lead engine, look at what local digital marketing agencies would do with it once it ships.
Questions to ask before hiring a web development company in Atlanta
Is a large firm safer than a small one for this kind of project?
Size buys continuity, not quality. A small studio with two developers is a risk if one of them leaves mid project, which is why source control in your own account and written documentation matter more than headcount. Ask who covers the work when the lead developer is unavailable.
Should we keep our current content system or move?
Move when the system blocks the way you want to publish or when nobody will support the version you are on. Staying is usually cheaper and often correct. Ask any supplier who recommends a move to say what it buys you in editing time and running cost, in plain terms.
How long should a website development project take?
Longer than the proposal says if your content is not ready. Development time is rarely the constraint on a replatform; approvals and content are. Ask for a schedule that names your obligations with dates, so a slip has a visible cause.
Can the same firm handle the site and an application?
Sometimes, but the skills diverge quickly. A marketing site and a customer portal are different products with different testing needs, and a firm that is strong at one may staff the other from whoever is free. Ask for the team behind the specific piece of work you care about.