Two completely different jobs share the name SEO in China
Before you read a single proposal, decide which of two mandates you are buying, because firms that are excellent at one are frequently useless at the other. The inbound mandate is a foreign brand trying to become visible to domestic buyers, which means Baidu, domestic hosting, licensing and simplified Chinese written natively. The outbound mandate is a manufacturer or exporter trying to reach overseas buyers, which means Google, English content, international link acquisition and a completely different competitive set. Both are sold under the same label in this market and the skill sets barely overlap.
The outbound side is enormous and often invisible to foreign buyers, because entire agency teams here exist to lift factory and trading company websites into English language search results for industrial buyers abroad. If that is your requirement, the questions that matter are about English editorial quality, technical writing in your product category and outreach to trade publications, not about domestic engine mechanics. If your requirement is inbound, all of that experience is irrelevant. Ask the firm to describe its last three engagements and you will know immediately which business it is really in.
The engine mix is plural and the shares move
Baidu carries the largest share of open web search and behaves in ways an international team will find old fashioned: literal about exact terms in titles and headings, heavily favourable to its own encyclopedia, forum and question properties, and openly punitive toward sites that are slow to serve from outside the network. Sogou, Shenma and Qihoo hold meaningful remainders, Shenma in particular on mobile, and Bing has a real and frequently overlooked niche among corporate and academic users whose machines default to it.
None of that captures where discovery actually starts for consumer categories, which is inside apps. Short video search, lifestyle platform search and messaging platform article search consume queries that never reach a web crawler. A plan that optimises only the website is optimising the smaller half of the opportunity. Ask a prospective agency to map, for one competitor in your category, how visibility is distributed across the open web and the closed platforms. The exercise is cheap and it exposes anyone working from a template.
Licensing, hosting and latency are one problem, not three
Serving a site from domestic infrastructure requires an ICP filing, and the filing requires a registered local entity. Without that, your site is hosted abroad, every request crosses a filtered boundary, and load times drop into a band that domestic engines treat as a quality problem. So the decision about legal presence determines the technical ceiling of the project, and it has a lead time measured in months.
Ask clearly who would hold the filing. An agency that files under its own entity is offering you speed in exchange for a dependency that is painful to unwind later. Ask the same question about the domain registration, the platform accounts and the verified profiles. The general rule that assets belong to the client is not a formality here, because reassigning them after a dispute is genuinely hard.
Language work that starts from local search data
Terminology rarely survives translation. The words buyers type are often not the official industry vocabulary, brand names acquire local renderings that competitors may already be using, and category segmentation differs from the one in your global keyword set. Research has to begin from domestic engine suggestion and related search data in simplified Chinese, then be checked against how buyers actually describe the problem in platform comments. Translating an English keyword list produces a plausible document and a site nobody finds.
Copy also sits under advertising rules that prohibit superlative claims, which makes the absolute language normal in Western landing pages a compliance exposure rather than a stylistic choice. Local writers handle this instinctively. If the sample copy in a proposal is full of claims about being first or best, it was not written by anyone who has been through a local legal review.
Links and coverage are a market with a price list
Paid placement is openly available, from sponsored articles to seeded discussion threads, and a large share of what is sold as link building is simply purchased and worthless. The domains involved exist to sell links, they have no audience, and engines here are better at recognising them than vendors admit. Meanwhile, genuinely valuable placements exist on industry association sites, trade portals, supplier directories and platform owned properties, and they are harder and slower to obtain.
Set the reporting rule before the first invoice: every placement is labelled paid or earned, with cost shown, and nothing is published under your brand without approval. Then ask to see the last set of domains the agency placed for a client in your category and look at them yourself. Ten minutes of your own inspection will tell you more than any case study.
Measurement, access and the reconciliation problem
Your global analytics stack will not report cleanly from inside the network, and it will not see the engines that matter. Domestic analytics platforms and domestic webmaster consoles fill the gap with different definitions of a session, a source and a conversion, so numbers will not reconcile with the rest of your markets. Decide early whether you are going to run parallel reporting or map the local stack into your global one, because retrofitting this after a year of data is expensive and often impossible.
Also define conversion honestly. Most journeys here end in a messaging app, a scanned code or a salesperson's phone, not a web form. Reporting that stops at the website will make everything that works look like it does not, and it will push budget toward the channels that are merely easiest to measure.
How to compare firms without comparing sales decks
Send three firms the same one page brief stating your entity status, your mandate, your product and your commercial goal, then compare what each one asked you before answering. Useful signals: whether they raised the filing question unprompted, whether they distinguished open web visibility from in app visibility, whether they named a specific person who would write the content, and whether they were willing to tell you that something in your brief is not worth doing.
Contractually, insist on named staffing rather than a team description, a defined response time, and a clean handover clause covering accounts, filings and content. Then ask what they would drop first if the budget were halved. The answer reveals what they actually believe drives results.
Getting from a long list to three names
Most buyers spend too long reading proposals and not enough time narrowing the field before proposals exist. Start from what you are selling and to whom, use that to decide inbound or outbound, and eliminate everyone whose recent work sits on the other side of that line. Then check whether the firm has worked in your sector's regulatory environment, because health, food, finance, education and cross border retail each carry approval requirements that shape what can be published at all.
Because search work here usually needs a platform counterpart, it is worth reviewing the social platform specialists working the same audiences and the broader digital marketing teams alongside your search shortlist, while the search agency category shows how firms position themselves in other markets. With three names you trust, request comparable proposals so the comparison is about scope and staffing rather than presentation.